| | Where We're Heading ... |  |
|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
Shysdin
Number of posts : 49
Registration date : 2007-01-18
|  Subject: Where We're Heading ...  Mon Jan 22, 2007 5:35 pm | |
| I am aware that a lot of people are certain specs for grinding, i myself am feral and have fell in love with the spec and think it can benefit the guild greatly to have a feral druid on board with melee such as enhancement shammy, dps warrior, rogues and so forth...
1) Feral Druid
2) Enhancement Shammy
3) Fury/MS Warrior
4) Combat Rogue
5) *Optional (Pref Another Warrior Or Rogue)
This Is What One Particular Group Will Look Like In Raids To Max. Melee Dps Effectively... Look Into Specs That Will Benefit PvE, If You Are Comfortable With A Particular Spec Stick With It, Let Us Know When You Hit 70 So We Can Start Looking At The Big Picture...We Plan On Running 10 Mans At First To Get Gear, And Raid Experience Behind Us...
"If everyone is thinking alike, then somebody isn't thinking." - George S. Patton | |
|
| | |
shyter
Admin
Number of posts : 135
Registration date : 2007-01-14
| | Subject: Re: Where We're Heading ... Mon Jan 22, 2007 7:09 pm | |
| - Shysdin wrote:
1) Feral Druid
2) Enhancement Shammy
3) Fury/MS Warrior
4) Combat Rogue
5) *Optional (Pref Another Warrior Or Rogue)
You're 5th would be a hunter, either the 3% damage from beast mastery or true-shot aura. | |
|
| | |
Shysdin
Number of posts : 49
Registration date : 2007-01-18
| | Subject: agree Mon Jan 22, 2007 8:58 pm | |
| yeah definetly with people who know what there doing that grp could be very effective, there is a countless amount of positive interactions between these classes  ty shyter...i forget those lovely hunters | |
|
| | |
Carnsir
Number of posts : 14
Registration date : 2007-01-26
| | Subject: Re: Where We're Heading ... Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:55 am | |
| Yes a hunter would be good....hey look over there /invite Carnsir  | |
|
| | |
Apparatus
Number of posts : 5
Registration date : 2007-01-25
| | Subject: Re: Where We're Heading ... Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:42 pm | |
| a DPS priest [shadow] could be very VERY beneficial. People know my DPS already. It also gives warlocks 15% more damage done ontop of 5% more damage done from misery. Thats 20% damage extra. So, I can be that. | |
|
| | |
shyter
Admin
Number of posts : 135
Registration date : 2007-01-14
| | Subject: Re: Where We're Heading ... Sun Jan 28, 2007 11:15 pm | |
| - Apparatus wrote:
- a DPS priest [shadow] could be very VERY beneficial. People know my DPS already. It also gives warlocks 15% more damage done ontop of 5% more damage done from misery. Thats 20% damage extra. So, I can be that.
Only one flaw in that MARVELOUS plan  , and that is that we will rarely use more then 1-2 locks in a 25 man raid! Losing a healer to befenit 1 dps'er isn't what we are looking for at the moment  But! of course there are exceptions, but untill we find a fight/event which might have your plan prove...usefull, its gana have to set aside  altho I know how fun dpsing as a shadow priest is  | |
|
| | |
Shysdin
Number of posts : 49
Registration date : 2007-01-18
| | Subject: shadow priest Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:13 pm | |
| we can fit a shadow priest into the dps caster group but PLEASE put vampiric embrace (THE ONE THAT RESTORES MANA) leave our healers 2 do the healing MAX DPS...
more dots...
more dots...ok
stop dots
"I envy people who drink -- at least they know what to blame everything on."
-Oscar Levant | |
|
| | |
Mason
Number of posts : 100
Registration date : 2007-01-15
| | Subject: Re: Where We're Heading ... Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:52 pm | |
| a group like that would be something like:
shadow priest
priest
priest
shaman
pally/druid
===infinate mana | |
|
| | |
Apparatus
Number of posts : 5
Registration date : 2007-01-25
| | Subject: Re: Where We're Heading ... Mon Jan 29, 2007 10:19 pm | |
| Its a 40 point talent, i have it. it restores 5% mana of the dps I do. Its pretty good. I have taken out 3 Alliance by myself and still had mana left without potting. That dot always goes on people. ;p | |
|
| | |
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: Where We're Heading ... | |
| |
|
| | |
| | Where We're Heading ... | |
|
